Michigan businesses have different competitive strategies and goals they put into action on a regular basis. In certain instances, one strategy may be more appropriate to use, and that same strategy may be inadvisable in another case.
This is certainly true when it comes to business litigation, as different strategies are used in different cases. The type of strategy that will work best in a particular corporate dispute will depend upon many factors, including the goals of the business, the likelihood of success in the case and the facts and law involved in the dispute.
Recently, for instance, this blog has discussed how some companies may choose to engage in settlement negotiations to resolve their disputes in an expedited manner. Settlement can have many advantages when it is done right, as it allows a business to put the legal case to an end and move on with their operations, while obtaining a certain result that might not be achieved if the case is left in the hands of a judge or jury.
On the other hand, settlement may not be appropriate in some cases. For instance, if the terms of the settlement being offered by the other side are less than favorable, or if future disputes may be likely, then it may make more sense to pursue the case further in litigation.
Our firm understands that every corporate dispute is unique, and we approach each of our clients on an individual basis to determine what the best strategy should be used in their particular circumstances. We vigorously advocate for our clients, whether that be through settlement negotiations, or in taking a case to trial. The bottom line is we work closely with our clients to understand their goals, and we put in place a strategy aimed at achieving those objectives. For more information on our firm's services, please visit our webpage on business litigation.
No Comments
Leave a comment